5. Repositories and Event Stores

The repository is the mechanism that provides access to aggregates. The repository acts as a gateway to the actual storage mechanism used to persist the data. In CQRS, the repositories only need to be able to find aggregates based on their unique identifier. Any other types of queries should be performed against the query database, not the Repository.

In the Axon Framework, all repositories must implement the Repository interface. This interface prescribes three methods: load(identifier, version), load(identifier) and add(aggregate). The load methods allows you to load aggregates from the repository. The optional version parameter is used to detect concurrent modifications (see Section 5.6, “Advanced conflict detection and resolution”). add is used to register newly created aggregates in the repository.

Depending on your underlying persistence storage and auditing needs, there are a number of base implementations that provide basic functionality needed by most repositories. Axon Framework makes a distinction between repositories that save the current state of the aggregate (see Section 5.1, “Standard repositories”), and those that store the events of an aggregate (see Section 5.2, “Event Sourcing repositories”).

Note that the Repository interface does not prescribe a delete(identifier) method. Deleting aggregates is done by invoking the (protected) markDeleted() method in an aggreate. This method is protected and not available from outside the aggregate. The motivation for this, is that the aggregate is responsible for maintaining its own state. Deleting an aggregate is a state migration like any other, with the only difference that it is irreversible in many cases. You should create your own meaningful method on your aggregate which sets the aggregate's state to "deleted". This also allows you to register any events that you would like to have published.

Repositories should use the isDeleted() method to find out if an aggregate has been marked for deletion. If such an aggregate is then loaded again, the repository should throw an AggregateNotFoundException (or when possible, an AggregateDeletedException). Axon's standard repository implementations will delete an aggregate from the repository, while event sourcing repositories will throw an Exception when an aggregate is marked deleted after initialization.

5.1. Standard repositories

Standard repositories store the actual state of an Aggregate. Upon each change, the new state will overwrite the old. This makes it possible for the query components of the application to use the same information the command component also uses. This could, depending on the type of application you are creating, be the simplest solution. If that is the case, Axon provides some building blocks that help you implement such a repository.


The most basic implementation of the repository is AbstractRepository. It takes care of the event publishing when an aggregate is saved. The actual persistence mechanism must still be implemented. This implementation doesn't provide any locking mechanism and expects the underlying data storage mechanism to provide it.

The AbstractRepository also ensures that activity is synchronized with the current Unit of Work. That means the aggregate is saved when the Unit of Work is committed.


If the underlying data store does not provide any locking mechanism to prevent concurrent modifications of aggregates, consider using the abstract LockingRepository implementation. Besides providing event dispatching logic, it will also ensure that aggregates are not concurrently modified.

You can configure the LockingRepository with a locking strategy, such an optimistic or a pessimistic one. When the optimistic lock detects concurrent access, the second thread saving an aggregate will receive a ConcurrencyException. The pessimistic lock will prevent concurrent access to the aggregate alltogether. The pessimistic locking strategy is the default strategy. A custom locking strategy can be provided by implementing the LockManager interface.

Deadlocks are a common problem when threads use more than one lock to complete their operation. In the case of Sagas, it is not uncommon that a command is dispatched -causing a lock to be acquired-, while still holding a lock on the aggregate that cause the Saga to be invoked. The PessimisticLockManager will automatically detect an imminent deadlock and will throw a DeadlockException before the deadlock actually occurs. It is safe to retry the operation once all nested Units of Work have been rolled back (to ensure all locks are released). The CommandGateway will not invoke the RetryScheduler if a DeadlockException occured to prevent a retry before all held locks have been released.

[Warning]Event ordering and optimistic locking strategy

Note that the optimistic lock doesn't lock any threads at all. While this reduces contention, it also means that the thread scheduler of your underlying architecture (OS, CPU, etc) is free to schedule threads as it sees fit. In high-concurrent environments (many threads accessing the same aggregate simultaneously), this could lead to events not being dispatched in exactly the same order as they are generated. If this guarantee is important, use pessimistic locking instead.

[Note]ConcurrencyException vs ConflictingModificationException

Note that there is a clear distinction between a ConcurrencyException and a ConflictingModificationException. The first is used to indicate a repository cannot save an aggregate, because the changes it contains were not applied to the latest available version. The latter indicates that the loaded aggregate contains changes that might not have been seen by the end-user. See Section 5.6, “Advanced conflict detection and resolution” for more information.


This is a repository implementation that can store JPA compatible Aggregates. It is configured with an EntityManager to manage the actual persistence, and a class specifiying the actual type of Aggregate stored in the Repository.

5.2. Event Sourcing repositories

Aggregate roots that implement the EventSourcedAggregateRoot interface can be stored in an event sourcing repository. Those repositories do not store the aggregate itself, but the series of events generated by the aggregate. Based on these events, the state of an aggregate can be restored at any time.


The EventSourcingRepository implementation provides the basic functionality needed by any event sourcing repository in the AxonFramework. It depends on an EventStore (see Section 5.3, “Event store implementations”), which abstracts the actual storage mechanism for the events and an AggregateFactory, which is reponsible for creating uninitialized aggregate instances.

The AggregateFactory specifies which aggregate needs to be created and how. Once an aggregate has been created, the EventSourcingRepository can initialize is using the Events it loaded from the Event Store. Axon Framework comes with a number of AggregateFactory implementations that you may use. If they do not suffice, it is very easy to create your own implementation.


The GenericAggregateFactory is a special AggregateFactory implementation that can be used for any type of Event Sourced Aggregate Root. The GenericAggregateFactory creates an instance of the Aggregate type the repository manages. The Aggregate class must be non-abstract and declare a default no-arg constructor that does no initialization at all.

The GenericAggregateFactory is suitable for most scenarios where aggregates do not need special injection of non-serializable resources.


Depending on your architectural choices, it might be useful to inject dependencies into your aggregates using Spring. You could, for example, inject query repositories into your aggregate to ensure the existance (or inexistance) of certain values.

To inject dependencies into your aggregates, you need to configure a prototype bean of your aggregate root in the Spring context that also defines the SpringPrototypeAggregateFactory. Instead of creating regular instances of using a constructor, it uses the Spring Application Context to instantiate your aggregates. This will also inject any dependencies in your aggregate.

Implementing your own AggregateFactory

In some cases, the GenericAggregateFactory just doesn't deliver what you need. For example, you could have an abstract aggregate type with multiple implementations for different scenarios (e.g. PublicUserAccount and BackOfficeAccount both extending an Account). Instead of creating different repositories for each of the aggregates, you could use a single repository, and configure an AggregateFactory that is aware of the different implementations.

The AggregateFactory must specify the aggregate type identifier. This is a String that the Event Store needs to figure out which events belong to which type of aggregate. Typically, this name is deducted from the abstract super-aggregate. In the given example that could be: Account.

The bulk of the work the Aggregate Factory does is creating uninitialized Aggregate instances. It must do so using a given aggregate identifier and the first Event from the stream. Usually, this Event is a creation event which contains hints about the expected type of aggregate. You can use this information to choose an implementation and invoke its constructor. Make sure no Events are applied by that constructor; the aggregate must be uninitialized.


Initializing aggregates based on the events can be a time-consuming effort, compared to the direct aggregate loading of the simple repository implementations. The CachingEventSourcingRepository provides a cache from which aggregates can be loaded if available. You can configure any jcache implementation with this repository. Note that this implementation can only use caching in combination with a pessimistic locking strategy.


Using a cache with optimistic locking could cause undesired side-effects. Optimistic locking allows concurrent access to objects and will only fail when two threads have concurrently made any modifications to that object. When using a cache, both threads will receive the same instance of the object. They will both apply their changes to that same instance, potentially interfering with eachother.


The HybridJpaRepository is a combination of the GenericJpaRepository and an Event Sourcing repository. It can only deal with event sourced aggregates, and stores them in a relational model as well as in an event store. When the repository reads an aggregate back in, it uses the relational model exclusively.

This repository removes the need for Event Upcasters (see Section 5.4, “Event Upcasting”), making data migrations potentially easier. Since the aggregates are event sourced, you keep the ability to use the given-when-then test fixtures (see Chapter 8, Testing). On the other hand, since it doesn't use the event store for reading, it doesn't allow for automated conflict resolution.

5.3. Event store implementations

Event Sourcing repositories need an event store to store and load events from aggregates. Typically, event stores are capable of storing events from multiple types of aggregates, but it is not a requirement.

Axon provides a number of implementations of event stores, all capable of storing all domain events (those raised from an Aggregate). These event stores use a Serializer to serialize and deserialize the event. By default, Axon provides an implementation of the Event Serializer that serializes events to XML: the XStreamSerializer.

5.3.1. FileSystemEventStore

The FileSystemEventStore stores the events in a file on the file system. It provides good performance and easy configuration. The downside of this event store is that is does not provide transaction support and doesn't cluster very well. The only configuration needed is the location where the event store may store its files and the serializer to use to actually serialize and deserialize the events.

Note that the FileSystemEventStore is not aware of transactions and cannot automatically recover from crashes. Furthermore, it stores a single file for each aggregate, potentially creating too many files for the OS to handle. It is therefore not a suitable implementation for production environments.

[Tip]Out of diskspace

When using the FileSystemEventStore in a test environment (or other environment where many aggregate may be created), you may end up with an "Out of disk space" error, even if there is plenty of room on the disk. The cause is that the filesystem runs out of i-nodes (or an equivalent when not on a Unix filesystem). This typically means that a filesystem holds too many files.

To prevent this problem, make sure the output directory of the FileSystemEventStore is cleaned after each test run.

5.3.2. JpaEventStore

The JpaEventStore stores events in a JPA-compatible data source. Unlike the file system version, the JPAEventStore supports transactions. The JPA Event Store stores events in so called entries. These entries contain the serialized form of an event, as well as some fields where meta-data is stored for fast lookup of these entries. To use the JpaEventStore, you must have the JPA (javax.persistence) annotations on your classpath.

By default, the event store needs you to configure your persistence context (defined in META-INF/persistence.xml file) to contain the classes DomainEventEntry and SnapshotEventEntry (both in the org.axonframework.eventstore.jpa package).

Below is an example configuration of a persistence context configuration:

<persistence xmlns="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/persistence" version="1.0">
    <persistence-unit name="eventStore"(1) transaction-type="RESOURCE_LOCAL">
        <class>org...eventstore.jpa.DomainEventEntry</class> (2)


In this sample, there is is specific persistence unit for the event store. You may, however, choose to add the third line to any other persistence unit configuration.


This line registers the DomainEventEntry (the class used by the JpaEventStore) with the persistence context.

[Note]Detecting duplicate key violations in the database

Axon uses Locking to prevent two threads from accessing the same Aggregate. However, if you have multiple JVMs on the same database, this won't help you. In that case, you'd have to rely on the database to detect conflicts. Concurrent access to the event store will result in a Key Constraint Violation, as the table only allows a single Event for an aggregate with any sequence number. Inserting a second event for an existing aggregate with an existing sequence number will result in an error.

The JPA EventStore can detect this error and translate it to a ConcurrencyException. However, each database system reports this violation differently. If you register your DataSource with the JpaEventStore, it will try to detect the type of database and figure out which error codes represent a Key Constraint Violation. Alternatively, you may provide a PersistenceExceptionTranslator instance, which can tell if a given exception represents a Key Constraint Violation.

If no DataSource or PersistenceExceptionTranslator is provided, exceptions from the Database driver are thrown as-is.

Working with multiple Persistence Contexts

By default, the JPA Event Store expects the application to have only a single, container managed, persistence context. In many cases, however, an application has more than one. In that case, you must provide an explicit EntityManagerProvider implementation that returns the EntityManager instance for the EventStore to use. This also allows for application managed persistence contexts to be used. It is the EntityManagerProvider's responsiblity to provide a correct instance of the EntityManager.

There are a few implementations of the EntityManagerProvider available, each for different needs. The SimpleEntityManagerProvider simply returns the EntityManager instance which is given to it at construction time. This makes the implementation a simple option for Container Managed Contexts. Alternatively, there is the ContainerManagedEntityManagerProvider, which returns the default persistence context, and is used by default by the Jpa Event Store.

If you have a persistence unit called "myPersistenceUnit" which you wish to use in the JpaEventStore, this is what the EntityManagerProvider implementation could look like:

public class MyEntityManagerProvider implements EntityManagerProvider {

    private EntityManager entityManager;

    public EntityManager getEntityManager() {
        return entityManager;

    @PersistenceContext(unitName = "myPersistenceUnit")
    public void setEntityManager(EntityManager entityManager) {
        this.entityManager = entityManager;

Customizing the Event storage

By default, the JPA Event Store stores entries in DomainEventEntry and SnapshotEventEntry entities. While this will suffice in many cases, you might encounter a situation where the meta-data provided by these entities is not enough. Or you might want to store events of different aggregate types in different tables.

If that is the case, you may provide your own implementation of EventEntryStore in the JPA Event Store's constructor. You will need to provide implementations of methods that load and store serialized events. Check the API Documentation of the EventEntryStore class for implementation requirements.

[Warning]Memory consumption warning

Note that persistence providers, such as Hibernate, use a first-level cache on their EntityManager implementation. Typically, this means that all entities used or returned in queries are attached to the EntityManager. They are only cleared when the surrounding transaction is committed or an explicit "clear" in performed inside the transaction. This is especially the case when the Queries are executed in the context of a transaction.

To work around this issue, make sure to exclusively query for non-entity objects. You can use JPA's "SELECT new SomeClass(parameters) FROM ..." style queries to work around this issue. Alternatively, call EntityManager.flush() and EntityManager.clear() after fetching a batch of events. Failure to do so might result in OutOfMemoryExceptions when loading large streams of events.

[Note]Hibernate support

The EventEntryStore implementation used by Axon automatically detects whether Hibernate is used as JPA implementation. If that is the case, it will use some Hiberante-specific features to optimize performance while reducing memory consumption. To prevent Hibernate specific logic, configure the JPA Event Store to use the DefaultEventEntryStore instead.

5.3.3. MongoDB Event Store

MongoDB is a document based NoSQL store. It scalability characteristics make it suitable for use as an Event Store. Axon provides the MongoEventStore, which uses MongoDB as backing database. It is contained in the Axon Mongo module (Maven artifactId axon-mongo).

Events are stored in two separate collections: one for the actual event streams and one for the snapshots.

By default, the MongoEventStore stores each event in a separate document. It is, however, possible to change the StorageStrategy used. The alternative provided by Axon is the DocumentPerCommitStorageStrategy, which creates a single document for all Events that have been stored in a single commit (i.e. in the same DomainEventStream).

Storing an entire commit in a single document has the advantage that a commit is stored atomically. Furthermore, it requires only a single roundtrip for any number of events. A disadvantage is that it becomes harder to query events manually or through the EventStoreManagement methods. When refactoring the domain model, for example, it is harder to "transfer" events from one aggregate to another if they are included in a "commit document".

The MongoDB doesn't take a lot of configuration. All it needs is a reference to the collections to store the Events in, and you're set to go.

5.3.4. Implementing your own event store

If you have specific requirements for an event store, it is quite easy to implement one using different underlying data sources. Reading and appending events is done using a DomainEventStream, which is quite similar to iterator implementations.

Instead of eagerly deserializing Events, consider using the SerializedDomainEventMessage, which will postpone deserialization of Meta Data and Payload until it is actually used by a handler.


The SimpleDomainEventStream class will make the contents of a sequence ( List or array) of EventMessage instances accessible as event stream.

5.3.5. Influencing the serialization process

Event Stores need a way to serialize the Event to prepare it for storage. By default, Axon provides the XStreamSerializer, which uses XStream to serialize Events into XML and vice versa. XStream is reasonably fast and is more flexible than Java Serialization. Furthermore, the result of XStream serialization is human readable. Quite useful for logging and debugging purposes.

The XStreamSerializer can be configured. You can define aliases it should use for certain packages, classes or even fields. Besides being a nice way to shorten potentially long names, aliases can also be used when class definitions of event change. For more information about aliases, visit the XStream website.

[Note]Spring XML Configuration and Serializer Customization

Configuring the serializer using Java code (or other JVM languages) is easy. However, configuring it in a Spring XML Application Context is not so trivial, due to its limitations to invoke methods. One of the options is to create a FactoryBean that creates an instance of an XStreamSerializer and configures it in code. Check the Spring Reference

You may also implement your own Serializer, simply by creating a class that implements Serializer, and configuring the Event Store to use that implementation instead of the default.

5.4. Event Upcasting

Due to the ever-changing nature of software applications it is likely that event definitions also change over time. Since the Event Store is considered a read and append-only data source, your application must be able to read all events, regardless of when they have been added. This is where upcasting comes in.

Originally a concept of object-oriented programming, where: "a subclass gets cast to it's superclass automatically when needed", the concept of upcasting can also be applied to event sourcing. To upcast an event means to transform it from its original structure to its new structure. Unlike OOP upcasting, event upcasting cannot be done in full automation because the structure of the new event is unknown to the old event. Manually written Upcasters have to be provided to specify how to upcast the old structure to the new structure.

Upcasters are classes that take one input event of revision x and output zero or more new events of revision x + 1. Moreover, upcasters are processed in a chain, meaning that the output of one upcaster is sent to the input of the next. This allows you to update events in an incremental manner, writing an Upcaster for each new event revision, making them small, isolated, and easy to understand.


Perhaps the greatest benefit of upcasting is that it allows you to do non-destructive refactoring, i.e. the complete event history remains intact.

In this section we'll explain how to write an upcaster, describe the two implementations of the Upcaster Chain that come with Axon, and explain how the serialized representations of events affects how upcasters are written.

To allow an upcaster to see what version of serialized object they are receiving, the Event Store stores a revision number as well as the fully qualified name of the Event. This revision number is generated by a RevisionResolver, configured in the serializer. Axon provides several implementations of the RevisionResolver, such as the AnnotationRevisionResolver, which checks for an @Revision annotation on the Event payload, a SerialVersionUIDRevisionResolver that uses the serialVersionUID as defined by Java Serialization API and a FixedValueRevisionResolver, which always returns a predefined value. The latter is useful when injecting the current application version. This will allow you to see which version of the application generated a specific event.

5.4.1. Writing an upcaster

To explain how to write an upcaster for Axon we'll walk through a small example, describing the details of writing an upcaster as we go along.

Let's assume that there is an Event Store containing many AdministrativeDetailsUpdated events. New requirements have let to the introduction of two new events: AddressUpdatedEvent and InsurancePolicyUpdatedEvent. Previously though, all information in these two events was contained in the old AdministrativeDetailsUpdatedEvent, which is now deprecated. To nicely handle this situation we'll write an upcaster to transform the AdministrativeDetailsUpdatedEvent into an AddressUpdatedEvent and an InsurancePolicyUpdatedEvent.

Here is the code for an upcaster:

import org.dom4j.Document;
public class AdministrativeDetailsUpdatedUpcaster implements Upcaster<Document> { (1)

    public boolean canUpcast(SerializedType serializedType) { (2)
        return serializedType.getName().equals("org.example.AdministrativeDetailsUpdated") &&

    public Class<Document> expectedRepresentationType() { (3)
        return Document.class;

    public List<SerializedObject<Document>> upcast(SerializedObject<Document> intermediateRepresentation,
                                                   List<SerializedType> expectedTypes, Up(4)castingContext context) {
        Document administrativeDetailsUpdatedEvent = intermediateRepresentation.getData();

        Document addressUpdatedEvent =
                new DOMDocument(new DOMElement("org.example.InsurancePolicyUpdatedEvent"));

        Document insurancePolicyUpdatedEvent =
                new DOMDocument(new DOMElement("org.example.InsurancePolicyUpdatedEvent"));

        List<SerializedObject<?>> upcastedEvents = new ArrayList<SerializedObject<?>>();
        upcastedEvents.add(new SimpleSerializedObject<Document>(
                addressUpdatedEvent, Document.class, expectedTypes.get(0)));
        upcastedEvents.add(new SimpleSerializedObject>Document>(
                insurancePolicyUpdatedEvent, Document.class, expectedTypes.get(1)));
        return upcastedEvents;

    public List<SerializedType> upcast(SerializedType serializedType) { (5)
        SerializedType addressUpdatedEventType = 
                new SimpleSerializedType("org.example.AddressUpdatedEvent", "1");
        SerializedType insurancePolicyUpdatedEventType = 
                new SimpleSerializedType("org.example.InsurancePolicyUpdatedEvent", "1");
        return Arrays.asList(addressUpdatedEventType, insurancePolicyUpdatedEventType);


First we have to create a class that implements the Upcaster interface. Then we have to decide on which content type to work. For this example dom4j documents are used as they'll fit nicely with an event store that uses XML to store events.


In Axon, Events have a revision, if the definition of an event changes, you should update its revision as well. The canUpcast method can then be used to check if an event needs to be upcasted. In the example we return true on the canUpcast method only when the incoming event has the type org.example.AdministrativeDetailsUpdatedEvent and has revision number 0. Axon will take care of calling the Upcaster's upcast method if the canUpcast method on that Upcaster returns true.


Due to Java's type erasure we have to implement the expectedRepresentationType method to provide Axon with runtime type information on the content type by returning the Class object of the content type. The content type is used at runtime to determine how the incoming event needs to be converted to provide the upcaster with the event with the correct type.


By copying the address and policy element from the AdministrativeDetailsUpdatedEvent each into its own document, the event is upcasted. Deserializing the result would get us an instance of the InsurancePolicyUpdatedEvent and an instance of the AddressUpdatedEvent.


Upcasting can be expensive, possibly involving type conversion, deserialization and logic. Axon is smart enough to prevent this from happening when it is not neccesary through the concept of SerializedTypes. SerializedTypes provide Axon with the information to delay event upcasting until the application requires it.

5.4.2. The Upcaster Chain

The Upcaster Chain is responsible for upcasting events by chaining the output of one upcaster to the next. It comes in the following two flavours:

  • The SimpleUpcasterChain immediately upcasts all events given to it and returns them.

  • The LazyUpcasterChain prepares the events to be upcasted but only upcasts the events that are actually used. Whether or not your application needs all events this can give you a significant performance benefit. In the worst case it's as slow as the SimpleUpcasterChain. The LazyUpcasterChain does not guarantee that all the events in an Event Stream are in fact upcasted. When your upcasters rely on information from previous events, this may be a problem.

The LazyUpcasterChain is a safe choice if your upcasters are stateless or do not depend on other upcasters. Always consider using the LazyUpcasterChain since it can provide a great performance benefit over the SimpleUpcasterChain. If you want guaranteed upcasting in a strict order, use the SimpleUpcasterChain.

5.4.3. Content type conversion

An upcaster works on a given content type (e.g. dom4j Document). To provide extra flexibility between upcasters, content types between chained upcasters may vary. Axon will try to convert between the content types automatically by using ContentTypeConverters. It will search for the shortest path from type x to type y, perform the conversion and pass the converted value into the requested upcaster. For performance reasons, conversion will only be performed if the canUpcast method on the receiving upcaster yields true.

The ContentTypeConverters may depend on the type of serializer used. Attempting to convert a byte[] to a dom4j Document will not make any sence unless a Serializer was used that writes an event as XML. To make sure the UpcasterChain has access to the serializer-specific ContentTypeConverters, you can pass a reference to the serializer to the constructor of the UpcasterChain.


To achieve the best performance, ensure that all upcasters in the same chain (where one's output is another's input) work on the same content type.

If the content type conversion that you need is not provided by Axon you can always write one yourself using the ContentTypeConverter interface.

5.5. Snapshotting

When aggregates live for a long time, and their state constantly changes, they will generate a large amount of events. Having to load all these events in to rebuild an aggregate's state may have a big performance impact. The snapshot event is a domain event with a special purpose: it summarises an arbitrary amount of events into a single one. By regularly creating and storing a snapshot event, the event store does not have to return long lists of events. Just the last snapshot events and all events that occurred after the snapshot was made.

For example, items in stock tend to change quite often. Each time an item is sold, an event reduces the stock by one. Every time a shipment of new items comes in, the stock is incremented by some larger number. If you sell a hundred items each day, you will produce at least 100 events per day. After a few days, your system will spend too much time reading in all these events just to find out wheter it should raise an "ItemOutOfStockEvent". A single snapshot event could replace a lot of these events, just by storing the current number of items in stock.

5.5.1. Creating a snapshot

Snapshot creation can be triggered by a number of factors, for example the number of events created since the last snapshot, the time to initialize an aggregate exceeds a certain threshold, time-based, etc. Currently, Axon provides a mechanism that allows you to trigger snapshots based on an event count threshold.

The EventCountSnapshotterTrigger provides the mechanism to trigger snapshot creation when the number of events needed to load an aggregate exceeds a certain threshold. If the number of events needed to load an aggregate exceeds a certain configurable threshold, the trigger tells a Snapshotter to create a snapshot for the aggregate.

The snapshot trigger is configured on an Event Sourcing Repository and has a number of properties that allow you to tweak triggering:

  • Snapshotter sets the actual snapshotter instance, responsible for creating and storing the actual snapshot event;

  • Trigger sets the threshold at which to trigger snapshot creation;

  • ClearCountersAfterAppend indicates whether you want to clear counters when an aggregate is stored. The optimal setting of this parameter depends mainly on your caching strategy. If you do not use caching, there is no problem in removing event counts from memory. When an aggregate is loaded, the events are loaded in, and counted again. If you use a cache, however, you may lose track of counters. Defaults to true unless the AggregateCache or AggregateCaches is set, in which case it defaults to false.

  • AggregateCache and AggregateCaches allows you to register the cache or caches that you use to store aggregates in. The snapshotter trigger will register itself as a listener on the cache. If any aggregates are evicted, the snapshotter trigger will remove the counters. This optimizes memory usage in the case your application has many aggregates. Do note that the keys of the cache are expected to be the Aggregate Identifier.

A Snapshotter is responsible for the actual creation of a snapshot. Typically, snapshotting is a process that should disturb the operational processes as little as possible. Therefore, it is recommended to run the snapshotter in a different thread. The Snapshotter interface declares a single method: scheduleSnapshot(), which takes the aggregate's type and identifier as parameters.

Axon provides the AggregateSnapshotter, which creates and stores AggregateSnapshot instances. This is a special type of snapshot, since it contains the actual aggregate instance within it. The repositories provided by Axon are aware of this type of snapshot, and will extract the aggregate from it, instead of instantiating a new one. All events loaded after the snapshot events are streamed to the extracted aggregate instance.


Do make sure that the Serializer instance you use (which defaults to the XStreamSerializer) is capable of serializing your aggregate. The XStreamSerializer requires you to use either a Hotspot JVM, or your aggregate must either have an accessible default constructor or implement the Serializable interface.

The AbstractSnapshotter provides a basic set of properties that allow you to tweak the way snapshots are created:

  • EventStore sets the event store that is used to load past events and store the snapshots. This event store must implement the SnapshotEventStore interface.

  • Executor sets the executor, such as a ThreadPoolExecutor that will provide the thread to process actual snapshot creation. By default, snapshots are created in the thread that calls the scheduleSnapshot() method, which is generally not recommended for production.

The AggregateSnapshotter provides on more property:

  • AggregateFactories is the property that allows you to set the factories that will create instances of your aggregates. Configuring multiple aggregate factories allows you to use a single Snapshotter to create snapshots for a variety of aggregate types. The EventSourcingRepository implementations provide access to the AggregateFactory they use. This can be used to configure the same aggregate factories int he Snapshotter as the ones used in the repositories.


If you use an executor that executes snapshot creation in another thread, make sure you configure the correct transaction management for your underlying event store, if necessary. Spring users can use the SpringAggregateSnapshotter, which allows you to configure a PlatformTransactionManager. The SpringAggregateSnapshotter will autowire all aggregate factories (either directly, or via the Repository), if a list is not explicitly configured.

5.5.2. Storing Snapshot Events

All Axon-provided Event Store implementations are capable of storing snapshot events. They provide a special method that allows a DomainEventMessage to be stored as a snapshot event. You have to initialize the snapshot event completely, including the aggregate identifier and the sequence number. There is a special constructor on the GenericDomainEventMessage for this purpose. The sequence number must be equal to the sequence number of the last event that was included in the state that the snapshot represents. In most cases, you can use the getVersion() on the AggregateRoot (which each event sourced aggregate implements) to obtain the sequence number to use in the snapshot event.

When a snapshot is stored in the Event Store, it will automatically use that snapshot to summarize all prior events and return it in their place. All event store implementations allow for concurrent creation of snapshots. This means they allow snapshots to be stored while another process is adding Events for the same aggregate. This allows the snapshotting process to run as a separate process alltogether.


Normally, you can archive all events once they are part of a snapshot event. Snapshotted events will never be read in again by the event store in regular operational scenario's. However, if you want to be able to reconstruct aggregate state prior to the moment the snapshot was created, you must keep the events up to that date.

Axon provides a special type of snapshot event: the AggregateSnapshot, which stores an entire aggregate as a snapshot. The motivation is simple: your aggregate should only contain the state relevant to take business decisions. This is exactly the information you want captured in a snapshot. All Event Sourcing Repositories provided by Axon recognize the AggregateSnapshot, and will extract the aggregate from it. Beware that using this snapshot event requires that the event serialization mechanism needs to be able to serialize the aggregate.

5.5.3. Initializing an Aggregate based on a Snapshot Event

A snapshot event is an event like any other. That means a snapshot event is handled just like any other domain event. When using annotations to demarcate event handers (@EventHandler), you can annotate a method that initializes full aggregate state based on a snapshot event. The code sample below shows how snapshot events are treated like any other domain event within the aggregate.

public class MyAggregate extends AbstractAnnotatedAggregateRoot {

    // ... code omitted for brevity

    protected void handleSomeStateChangeEvent(MyDomainEvent event) {
        // ...

    protected void applySnapshot(MySnapshotEvent event) {
        // the snapshot event should contain all relevant state
        this.someState = event.someState;
        this.otherState = event.otherState;

There is one type of snapshot event that is treated differently: the AggregateSnapshot. This type of snapshot event contains the actual aggregate. The aggregate factory recognizes this type of event and extracts the aggregate from the snapshot. Then, all other events are re-applied to the extracted snapshot. That means aggregates never need to be able to deal with AggregateSnapshot instances themselves.

5.5.4. Pruning Snapshot Events

Once a snapshot event is written, it prevents older events and snapshot events from being read. Domain Events are still used in case a snapshot event becomes obsolete due to changes in the structure of an aggregate. The older snapshot events are hardly ever needed. SnapshotEventStore implementation may choose to keep only a limited amount of snapshots (e.g. only one) for each aggregate.

The JpaEventStore allows you to configure the amount of snapshots to keep per aggregate. It defaults to 1, meaning that only the latest snapshot event is kept for each aggregate. Use setMaxSnapshotsArchived(int) to change this setting. Use a negative integer to prevent pruning altogether.

5.6. Advanced conflict detection and resolution

One of the major advantages of being explicit about the meaning of changes, is that you can detect conflicting changes with more precision. Typically, these conflicting changes occur when two users are acting on the same data (nearly) simultaneously. Imagine two users, both looking at a specific version of the data. They both decide to make a change to that data. They will both send a command like "on version X of this aggregate, do that", where X is the expected version of the aggregate. One of them will have the changes actually applied to the expected version. The other user won't.

Instead of simply rejecting all incoming commands when aggregates have been modified by another process, you could check whether the user's intent conflicts with any unseen changes. One way to do this, is to apply the command on the latest version of the aggregate, and check the generated events against the events that occurred since the version the user expected. For example, two users look at a Customer, which has version 4. One user notices a typo in the customer's address, and decides to fix it. Another user wants to register the fact that the customer moved to another address. If the fist user applied his command first, the second one will make the change to version 5, instead of the version 4 that he expected. This second command will generate a CustomerMovedEvent. This event is compared to all unseen events: AddressCorrectedEvent, in this case. A ConflictResolver will compare these events, and decide that these conflicts may be merged. If the other user had committed first, the ConflictResolver would have decided that a AddressCorrectedEvent on top of an unseen CustomerMovedEvent is considered a conflicting change.

Axon provides the necessary infrastructure to implement advanced conflict detection. By default, all repositories will throw a ConflictingModificationException when the version of a loaded aggregate is not equal to the expected version. Event Sourcing Repositories offer support for more advanced conflict detection, as decribed in the paragraph above.

To enable advanced conflict detection, configure a ConflictResolver on the EventSourcingRepository. This ConflictResolver is responsible for detecting conflicting modifications, based on the events representing these changes. Detecting these conflicts is a matter of comparing the two lists of DomainEvents provided in the resolveConflicts method declared on the ConflictResolver. If such a conflict is found, a ConflictingModificationException (or better, a more explicit and explanatory subclass of it) must be thrown. If the ConflictResolver returns normally, the events are persisted, effectively meaning that the concurrent changes have been merged.